Special to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise
Send Letters to [email protected]
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication
Letters to the editor are welcome on any and all subjects. Sign your letter in the text body with your name and e-mail address as you wish them to appear, otherwise we will use the information in the “From:” header! Please indicate a subject. Otherwise you risk the editor picking a subject completely irrelevant to the matter at hand.
Jeff Fullerton on Democrats Want to Abolish Prisons
Albert Perez on RE: The New Age of Censorship: How Postmodernism Reframed Censorship as Productive
Ares
Just pre-ordered my copy of L. Neil Smith’s Ares from Amazon. Comes out 20 June, 2023.
Help make it a best seller.
Albert Perez
[email protected]
Note: Favorable reviews on Amazon help sell books. TLE would also like some reviews. — Editor
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Happy with this piece? Annoyed? Disagree? Speak your peace.
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication
Democrats Want to Abolish Prisons
Really? Democrats Want to Abolish Prisons? This ought to mean I can do anything I want and and not worry about being arrested. And I can stop paying taxes too!
Furthermore; Frontier Justice is so much more efficient than running a criminal justice system. Why pay for the cost of prosecuting and incarcerating criminals when it’s so much easier to summarily execute them when caught in the act at the scene of the crime? That’s puts an end to being robbed twice—first by the criminals and then by the system to keep, feed and provide them with exercise equipment and high speed internet in prison.
The democrats are actually onto something. They’ll change their tune once they realize the unintended consequences of this proposal is the ultimate Libertarian solution for so many social ill and will be the death of so many of their constituents.
Or maybe not considering that dead people are a population that consistently votes democratic!
Jeff Fullerton
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Happy with this piece? Annoyed? Disagree? Speak your peace.
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication
RE: The New Age of Censorship: How Postmodernism Reframed Censorship as Productive
A lot of people I knew from the Great Depression/World War II generation had an expression, “Cut it thick or cut it thin, baloney is still baloney.”
Censorship is a tool by which a ruling elite prevents challenges to its intellectual power and/or to establish that power. the classic example is the unwillingness by so many to condemn the recent assault on Salman Rushdie as the result of Moslem fanaticism for fear of appearing Islamophobic. The would be intellectual elite has decreed Islam, even its most fanatic practitioners may not be criticized; nor may those who use their faith as an excuse to do evil be condemned, as long as it is Islam.
We need Major ——- de Coverly to remind us that even if you call it bologna sausage it’s still baloney.
Albert Perez
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Happy with this piece? Annoyed? Disagree? Speak your peace.
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication