2nd Prize Winner
Age Group 16-18
The Slave Factory
by Gabe Page, age 18
Young people are frequent and docile victims of state aggression.
Society has told them through laws and mandates that they have no
rights and they have accepted this. They accept it because the adults
they trust accept it and the adults do so because they are products
of the same system. Some of the injustices and violations young
people are subjected to include compulsory military registration,
curfews, compulsory school attendance and legislated age limits. In
their own right, these violations against young people are all
harmful, but their sum effect is much worse. Uncontested violations
of young peoples' rights teach them to accept injustice and hence,
cripple their developing minds.
Children are always asking why things are the way they are. This
is an attempt by their innocent minds to understand the world around
them. Adults, on the other hand, almost never make such inquiries.
This is not because they understand the world, but because they have
grown to accept everything that is, as a fact of reality. Proof of
this can be found by asking the average adult a 'why question' and
following it up with a series of further 'why questions,' as children
so often do, until the adult finally admits (explicitly or
implicitly) that they don't really know the answer. For example: "Why
do you have to pay taxes?" "To take care of those less fortunate than
us?" "Yeah, but why do you have to do that?" "Because it's the right
thing to do." "But why is it the right thing to do?" "I don't know,
because it just is;" or, "Why do you ask so many (stupid) questions;"
or, "Go and help your mom in the kitchen," or any of the other
pantomimes of evasion.
So why do adults give up on trying to understand the world? Is it
because they spent so many years seeking answers and truth, with the
help and encouragement of parents, teachers, television and all the
other social and cultural influences, only to discover that the world
is utterly incomprehensible? No. Adults in general do not question,
do not challenge, (do not think) because society is a slave factory
and they have thusly been conditioned not to.
The priming of obedient citizens begins in childhood or earlier.
At this point it is the parents and baby-sitters unknowingly doing
the dirty work for the state. Children are constantly told to do
things without explanation. If they don't comply they are punished. A
good example of this occurs in many pre-schools. Children are told
that they must share their toys with others and if they don't want
to, they are made to sit in the corner by themselves and take a "time
out." From this children learn one thing and it is not benevolence
towards others. They learn to obey grown-ups, or in a larger sense,
obey authority.
This lesson is reinforced in adolescence. Young people are made at
school, at home and in society to do things, or else� Sometimes it is
"in their best interest" and other times it is "for the greater
good," but it is always at the threat of punishment and this is
coercion. Compulsory school attendance is one example of this. The
explanation behind compulsory school attendance is that it is in the
best interest of young people to attend school, and in most cases, it
probably is. This is very kind and caring of the legislation's
writers and supporters, but as people differ, so do their best
interests and hence the law is unjust. Only an individual can
determine his or her best interests. Furthermore, force is not a tool
of love and victims never profit from violence directed against them.
Aside from the moral or philosophical arguments against compulsory
school attendance, the fact is that it doesn't accomplish its alleged
educational goal. The law may physically place those young people,
who do not want to go to school behind a desk, but learning requires
more than attendance, it requires the mind and the mind can't be
forced. Education is very important, but the energies of its
activists would be much more effectively put to use in other ways
such as community outreach programs that work to emphasize education
as a cultural value. Compulsory school attendance is a violation of
an individual's right to make personal choices like whether or not he
or she wants to attend school.
By the time of high school graduation most people have really
internalized the "facts of life" like the generations before them
have. They "know" that there are some things in life, which don't
make any sense and that one does not want to do, but that one must do
them. They may not vocally admit to this, but their actions or lack
thereof do. They accepted compulsory school attendance, mandatory
volunteerism and curfews, and they will go on to face all other acts
of state aggression, save for maybe the most blatantly malicious, as
good, obedient subjects.
In addition to the obvious damage conditioning an individual to
accept his or her own slavery does, there is a subtler injury
delivered by this system, evidence for which I draw from the common
argument against the decriminalization of drugs. The argument in
reference contends that if the government does not outlaw drugs then
many more people will begin to use them. This may be true, but if it
is, why so? Are the masses as stupid as the champions of this
argument seem to suggest? I don't think so. But by depriving
individuals of their right to make personal choices, society arrests
the development of their independent judgement faculties. Therefore,
products of this system - victims of this society - by adulthood,
need the laws that limit their freedom (and that of others) because
without those laws they have no framework from which to determine
their best interests. And in the greatest of social tragedies, their
minds are thus crippled.
The good news is that society as a concept is not flawed and that
the injustices, which work to debilitate the mind, can be ended as
soon as full individual rights are recognized for everyone. As young
people are the trampled victims of this system and are voiceless in
the decision making process that limits their freedom, it is the
adults, who perpetuate it actively or passively, that bear the
responsibility for changing it. Young people, however, need not wait
for the work to be done. Their potential strength lies in their
greater ability to get through to other young people who may have
completely forsaken all adults and begun to rebel as a rule. As for
adults, they must speak up for young peoples' rights at the polls,
PTA meetings and any other venues of discussion. Those who are
parents have an especially great opportunity to fight these
injustices and help the cause of freedom by teaching their children
to think, instead of obey and to look inside for answers, instead of
outside to others. At times the system may seem a mighty mountain,
indomitable in its altitude and breadth, but an individual also is
large and his or her lone voice is capable of precipitating an
avalanche of change, as it brings consciousness to an issue.