T |
L. Neil Smith's
THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE Number 69, April 15, 2000 Capitol Gains Trumping "The Body"by Michael R. Allen
It has been years since the word "libertarian" meant more than
wanting less government than we have now. It once indicated a set of
beliefs that included individual rights, private property, limited
(or no) government and freedom of association. It meant that no one
would be forced to do anything by the state. Libertarians understood
that paper-manipulating bureaucrats like Alan Greenspan hampered the
free market and that war-making presidents like Ronald Reagan
threatened individual rights.
Of course, now the label sticks to anyone who proclaims himself
"socially liberal and economically conservative." Lately it has come
to rest on Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura and his political
fellow-traveller, Donald Trump. Why? Well, Ventura is for gay rights
and lower taxes. And the Donald is for Ventura.
Both men recently left their vehicle, the Reform Party, because it
wasn't in keeping with their brand of "libertarianism" (dropping the
ironic quotation marks hereafter). Specifically, the party will
likely nominate Pat Buchanan to run for president. Buchanan has
committed several heresies in the eyes of the libertarian Ventura: he
is culturally conservative, economically nationalist and firmly
noninterventionist.
The party could have pleased the two libertarians had it selected a
better candidate, like Lowell Weicker or John McCain. Weicker was
always for social liberalism and thought of himself as a fiscal
conservative -- he was a Republican, after all. He seemed pretty
libertarian to Ventura. And McCain was McCain, a man who had fought
in the noble sport of war. These were the men Trump and Ventura
wanted to run for the Reform nomination instead of Buchanan.
If anything, Trump and Ventura want to be popular -- which means to
do what is popular, like using the label libertarian and attacking
Buchanan. Fortunately, their popularity has not yet produced success.
Buchanan has been assailed primarily for his outspoken
noninterventionist views, though his other views have hurt him also.
Buchanan knows that war only makes for more government intrusion into
people's lives, whereas Trump and Ventura believe -- along with the
political establishment -- in the moral necessity of intervention.
Embracing the central tenet of meaningful libertarianism, Buchanan is
much more of a libertarian than either of his enemies.
As to his economic nationalism, Buchanan is no worse than anyone who
thinks government schools and subsidized mass transit are worthwhile
endeavors of the limited state. The conservative pundit has never
called for expanding either public schools or transit, but the brawny
governor has. As it is, the governor has endorsed a lot of ideas that
are anathema to real libertarians.
Ventura has been praised for some of his more libertarian views. As a
matter of fact, on Fox News (12/14/98), he called himself
"libertarian" and claimed to know and support the ideology. In his
infamous Playboy interview, he showed that he adheres to what now
passes for libertarian -- just not the libertarianism of Murray
Rothbard or even Milton Friedman. Most tellingly, he showed the
thoughtlessness of his ideology by making a major faux pas.
When asked about prostitution, he sensibly said that "prohibiting
something doesn't make it go away." Then, asked why this view was
unpopular in the United States, he proclaimed that religion was
responsible.
"Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who
need strength in numbers," posited Ventura. "It tells people to go
out and stick their noses in other people's business."
Perhaps the governor is not aware of the number of non-religious
liberals who are cheerleaders for anti-drug and anti-prostitution
laws. Perhaps he isn't aware of the large number of Christians who
have left the public school system to find freedom. If Ventura was a
principled libertarian, he would applaud the Christians who have
found freedom without asking for tax dollars. Instead, he chooses to
demean a voluntary association without looking at the facts.
Sure, there are a lot of authoritarians on the religious right -- but
no more so than on the impious left. But it is popular to bash
religious conservatism. It's also popular to support medical
marijuana, more money for government schools and phased-in tax cuts
-- three pillars of Ventura's philosophy. On close inspection, the
governor seems to support nearly everything that is politically
popular right now, though most of that is not good for human liberty.
Whatever this is, it is not libertarianism.
It seems Ventura has one tenet of his philosophy developed: he wants
to be what Lew Rockwell calls a "modal" libertarian, or at least a
cousin to the Clintonist left. They can have him, and Mr. Trump. Let
the word libertarian recover from the assault the Ventura camp has
perpetrated.
Next
to advance to the next article, or
|
|