 |
|
|
 THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE Number 709, February 24, 2013 "Crimes against the Constitution". Remember that phrase, and pass it around because we're going to be using it a lot.
Send Letters to editor@ncc-1776.org
These are the people who want your guns
L. Neil Smith
[ It's true, my friends, the people who think they own the world want most of us to die. Soon.—Editor ] Was that worth reading? Hi, Neil, Saw the column on the imaginary grenade attack at MBES Heh. Late at night on February 5, I forwarded this little image to Lara-Black, her admin staff, and the second grade teachers listed on the MBES web site.
Naturally, I just had to post a info page on my web site: By 12:50AM on the 7th, the entire MBES web site went 404. As of this writing, it's still gone. Coincidence? Perhaps, but I'd like to think otherwise. And just add it to the list of school stupidity: I would simply have purged the email addresses on the contact page instead of killing the entire site. Does killing their own web site constitute violence for which they have to suspend themselves? Also, the school started changing their story. By the 9th, the school claimed the boy threw rocks, that they had witness statements which they wouldn't allow anyone to see, and that they had held a disciplinary hearing before suspending the boy; they just didn't let the boy or his mother attend, nor even tell them there was a hearing. Of course, the school is claiming that FERPA 1974 prevents them from releasing any of the information that supports their version of events. We just have to take their word for it. Because... hey, they're the authorities. Apparently Mandie Watkins, the boy's mother, does have a record which could impact her credibility. But the last I looked into this, her (and the boy's) story was remaining consistent, while MBES changes and obfuscates their story. Carl "Bear" Bussjaeger
Was that worth reading? I call your attention to L. Neil Smith's editorial indictment of the UN's Agenda 21: This essay make's Beck's novel "Agenda 21" the OPTIMISTIC future.
[Amazon.com] or
[Barnes & Noble.com]
I can't say I 100% agree with ElNeil. I don't doubt that there are, among the global Nomenklatura, many True Believers. But I also think that there are substantial numbers of control freaks who are going along with the True Believers because they want control over the lives of everyone left alive after the eventual disruptions. They don't mind seeing hundreds of millions dead, but they're not after the billions of deaths it will take for the True Believers to realize their dreams—not because they really care about anybody, but because the more people under their control, the more power they have to exert. I now call them the Slavemasters, and I suspect that Mayor "We've Banned Salt and Sugar, Let's Ban Styrofoam Next" and Governor "Raving Gun Control Lunatic" and Senator "I Personally Looked at Pictures of Guns To Decide What To Ban" are among the latter group, rather than the True Believers. I'm not yet betting on which group the Narcissist in Chief is among personally (or whether he's playing a third game of letting the Western nations self-destruct so Shariah Islam can triumph), but his domestic enablers are undoubtedly mostly Slavemasters. Note that this arguably makes them more evil, rather than less evil. And it would be amusing to watch the final battle between the True Believers and the Slavemasters (and possible third party slavemasters—or fourth party, I haven't mentioned China yet—with different agendas than Agenda 21) from a safe distance—say, somewhere in Andromeda. Which presupposes that their manipulations won't result in a different sort of societal crisis first. But it's hard to gainsay ElNeil's conclusion regarding the present victim disarmament agenda: the objective is to degrade US private gun ownership through slow attrition—local gun control laws, federal registration and magazine capacity mandates, more and more "mental illnesses" which result in gun confiscation—until there are no longer enough citizens with Constitutionally mandated ("...shall not be infringed" and the Federalist Papers) military grade personal and collective defense weaponry to oppose this unspeakable evil. Jim Woosley
Was that worth reading? Not For Nothing They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
What then of those who would trade liberty for nothing? This question arises because Barrack Obama and Joe Biden, leaders and cheerleaders for new gun control laws, have admitted that the ideas they are pushing would do little if anything to prevent the massacres they are using as an excuse to impose "gun control" laws.These guys admit we gain nothing, yet they ask us to give up our right to arm ourselves as our judgement directs, not as some government lackey permits. Some justify this as making a symbolic statement. The problem with symbolic statements is that they have real consequences. On Ruby Ridge Federal Marshals picked a gun fight with a twelve year old boy by killing his dog. Later in the same confrontation an FBI sniper shot a mother holding a babe in her arms. At Waco the combined DEA, BATFE, and FBI wiped out eighty seven men women and children, many by burning them alive. This is how gun control laws are enforced for all practical purposes, by murdering innocents and yes, some folk who are not quite so innocent. Excuse me if I do not want to empower the Federal police forces to commit murder for the sake of symbolism. Please do not tell me you are passing laws to protect children of a kind that to date have been enforced by murdering children. Yet some people are in a rush to give up liberty for nothing, not even an illusion of security. They listen to leaders who tell them this is an acceptable bargain. One is reminded of stories in which people sell their souls to the devil, believing that since no such thing exists they have nothing to lose. Do these people perhaps believe they are not free and are thus giving up nothing for for nothing? If that is how little they value themselves fine, gut they have no right ir moral authority to trade my soul and my freedom, and I expect that most reading this feel the same. I can speak for no one other than my self, but perhaps there are others who share my sentiments. I say to the sad soulless slaves in question: Listen you sorry nidderlings, I have a soul and I have my freedom and they are not yours to bargain away. Not "for my own good," not "for the greater good," and definitely not for nothing. Try to bargain with what is mine and I will deal with you as I would any other thief and assassin who enters my house to ply his trade. And if this be treason, well you know the rest.... A.X. Perez
Was that worth reading? Mo. Sen.Wants to Outlaw Gun Laws I just sent the following message to Missouri State Senator Mike Leara, who has proposed a law against proposing gun laws. Senator Leara: Just saw your proposal against writing gun laws. I believe this could become the basis for a nationwide movement. I was just starting an article about the idea, which I will send you. Mine is [email protected]—what's yours? Check me out on Google,Wikipedia, and at Amazon.com if you have any doubts. I've been fighting this fight for 50 years. And better get rid of the Facebook filter, son. It could cause you to miss the boat. L.Neil Smith, author,lecturer
Was that worth reading? Well, the truth is fnally coming out. For more details, check www.reggin.com or any of a number of other web sites. The truth is that the giant pharmaceutcal companies (hereinafter called Big Pharma) has the federal government behind it. Big Pharma also has organized medicine behind it. With the federal government, organized medicine and Big Pharma working together, no one can get genuine medical care. Look at the latest oxymoron: Obamacare. Obama doesn't care! He cares only for himself and his immediate family. He's managed to hornswaggle enough people to get elected to a second term. Amazing! With his Praetorian Guard (sometimes spelled "Secret Service"), he flies wherever he likes in his private Boeing 747s. He and his entourage never submit to the indignities of the TSA. And all the costs are born by the taxpayers—you and me! (Oops! Sorry, I digress.) The question for which I never get a satisfactory answer is, whatever happened to the vaunted federal government's War on Cancer? The bill was passed nearly unanimously by both Houses of Congress and then signed into Law by the then President, Richard Milhous Nixon. Granted, it wasn't Nixon's idea, and he had other problems. Yet after billions of dollars and numerous new Presidents, what are the cause and cure of cancer? Hmmm. Can it be that hard? Dr. Tulio Simonchini, an oncologist in Rome, Italy has published a book based on his findings—Cancer Is a Fungus. His book has recently been translated into English, but it's not available in this country. I wonder whose ox would be gored if the truth were widely known in the USSA? Well, there are all the cancer hospitals. There are also all the Big Pharmas that sell expensive, patented drugs for chemotherapy. And the allopaths (M.D.'s) who make a lot of money "treating" this affliction. Dr. Simonchini uses a chemical to treat his patients, but it cannot be patented. The chemical is known as sodium bicarbonate—baking soda. Since administering it by mouth will cure an upset stomach but nothing more, the good doctor uses an IV and reputedly gets outstanding results. I've see Dr. Simonchini on the television program, Know the Cause. I'm a believer. The good doctor is onto something here. Now if only an M.D. or D.O. will have the guts to test Dr. Simonchini's technique! James McDonald
Was that worth reading? Barter Economy From Dave Pirtle via Charlie Acker ...
L. Neil Smith
Was that worth reading? What is the police loophole? There are some states, counties, cities, and municipalities in our great nation that fail to allow their citizens to fully exercise their right to keep and bear arms with restrictions such as magazine capacity or types of firearms that are widely available to citizens of other states, counties, cities, and municipalities. However, these government entities do not place these restrictions upon their own employees, such as police officers. What is this list? This is a list of companies that have taken the step to publicly announce that they will not sell items to states, counties, cities, and municipalities that restrict their citizens rights to own them; therefore closing the "police loophole" themselves. Don't see one that belongs on here or want your company on the list? Send me an email at [email protected] with "Loophole" in the subject. http://www.thepoliceloophole.com/ The Police Loophole
TLE AFFILIATE
|
|
|
|
Previous
Contents
Next
