THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE Number 721, May 19, 2013 "I think we may have reached a point, elected a President, who _possesses_ no individuality, no real being of his own, but is made up totally of the collective. Something like the Borg Queen."
Send Letters to editor@ncc-1776.org
Catch-484 (22 squared) Heller sure coined a term with his book, Catch-22... A good friend of mine sent along this example of Heller's "Catch-22" phrase-slash-book title:
I have no sympathy for indiscriminate blowers-uppers of innocents and property (nor discriminate blowers-uppers, for that matter), yet the authoritarian fan-dance on display here, just to stay out of court, thereby preserving the technique with which to abuse others—you?, me?—is ridiculousness of the first water. Ted Ball
Re: "The World's Greatest Propaganda Ministry" by Jeff Ganaposki I think Jeff is still confused. Of course democracies can be either direct or indirect. And "republic" just means "not a monarchy". And representation is a bogus idea, as (apparently) is a constitution. I can't see why people get wound up about these definitions. This country is clearly an oligarchy dressed up as a democratic (that is, there are elections) representative (we elect scumbags to rule us) republic (it's not a monarchy—yet). Whatever words a person prefers between "republic" or "democracy", neither one has anything to do with liberty. As to the best form of government, the correct answer is "none". Actually now that I think of it, since a republic is defined by what it is not, a country that is an anarchy could also be called a republic. "The Anarchist Republic of America", sounds good. But the USSR was also a legitimate republic so I wouldn't get too excited about republics... Paul Bonneau
TLE AFFILIATE
|