THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE Number 771, May 18, 2014 There are, broadly speaking, two main strands in the opposition to the New World Order. Where these two strands disagree is over the cause of the New World Order. For one, it is the final result of the Enlightenment. For the other strand, the enemy is a counter-Enlightenment.
Fox News Attacks the U.S. Army and Traditional American Values
Special to L. Neil Smith's The Libertarian Enterprise
I've been aware for a long time that commentators on the Fox News Channel get away with the most extremely jingoistic, the most atavistic, the most bigoted opinions in weekend commentaries that would make even the average weekday Fox viewer cringe. But the commentary quoted above from FNC's Liz Trotta managed to surprise even me. My friend, Brad Linaweaver, calls Fox News the Pentagon Channel because of all the 24-hour news channels Fox is the one that tends to support the agenda of those who find the Pentagon's ungodly budget always too small, no projection of military force anywhere in the world too unattractive, and no invasion of privacy or restriction of liberty unnecessary. After seeing lively debates on Fox on all these subjects —often dragging in quasi-libertarians like Senator Rand Paul or in-house personalities like Bob Beckel or Kennedy to take the opposition—I'd have to say that Brad is being only slightly sardonic. But unquestionably Fox, like much of the degraded talk-radio right today, has adopted the worst propaganda techniques that used to be the patented reserve of party-line Communists and World War II era Nazis. It's a perfect storm of spinning half truths or facts presented in a misleading context, tunnel-vision ideology, and ad hominem slurs replacing reasoned discourse. This was the technique perfected by Hitler's propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, but for those not a student of history like Mr. Linaweaver, one needs go no further than the average anonymous Internet troll to find this level of vile attack. In the above commentary Ms. Trotta manages to conflate the Veterans Administration—which does not treat active military—with the Army's healthcare policies for active-duty military, and conflates both with the Affordable Care Act that addresses only civilian medical care. Ms. Trotta manages to forget that homosexuals now serve openly in the U.S. military forces so a "feckless" Defense Secretary (who as an Army volunteer serving in combat earned two Purple Hearts) considering extending this policy to transgenders isn't that much of a stretch. But Ms. Trotta—in both managing to dismiss "gender dysphoria" as a treatable medical condition while simultaneously dismissing transgendering as a passing fashion—also does not know or chooses to ignore that as late as 1973 the American Psychiatric Association listed homosexuality in its official diagnostic manual as a mental illness.
As recently as last year's Libertopia conference I objected publicly to the pre-name-change Bradley Manning being referred to as "her" or "she." My reason—ineloquently expressed in an inappropriately caustic tone of voice—was that I considered it an Orwellian demand to ignore the evidence of the senses and refer to a biological male using feminine pronouns. My objection was not to transgendering but that transgendering—actual gender reassignment of a biological male into a biological female capable of achieving a natural pregnancy—was not yet medically possible. Stand a naked man and a naked woman up in front of a child. Ask the child to identify the gender of each. I think it would be a crime against the human mind to correct the child who sees a human being with male genitalia and demand that the child refer to that person as "she" or "her." But I was not a child when I made my angry remarks and I should have been capable of parsing the issues of gender reassignment without using as a rhetorical device a human being I consider a hero— Chelsea Manning. Chelsea Manning is listed by that name in the Special Thanks of my movie, Alongside Night. My own past mistakes aside, I regard that Liz Trotta's objections to Chelsea Manning being referred to as "her" or "she" is unadulterated bigotry. Trotta's wrapping herself in the flag while attacking both a Vietnam-era Purple-Heart veteran and branding as a traitor and sexually slurring an Iraq War Army volunteer whose conscience led her to expose video of war crimes buried by being classified is vile. Exercise of conscience in defense of justice, Ms. Trotta, is not exercise of ego. It's an American value and should be a Fox News value. Calling Private Manning a traitor is also a lie. Private Manning was never charged with treason, much less convicted of it. Referring to Wikileaks editor, Julian Assange, as a traitor is worse than a lie. It's moronic, inasmuch as Julian Assange is not and never has been an American. I am revolted by supposedly "conservative" commentators like Liz Trotta who—if they'd been reporting events at the Old North Bridge in Concord, Massachusetts April 19. 1775, would have commented that the Americans shooting at British military were traitors. What values does Liz Trotta wish to "conserve"—the mindless support for tyranny that this country fought a bloody revolution to end? Respect for individual differences is an American value and should be a Fox News value, Ms. Trotta. Belief in acting to achieve justice above robotic obedience to authority is an American value and should be a Fox News value, Ms. Trotta. And respect for heroes who put themselves in harm's way to protect you is an American value and should be a Fox News value, Ms. Trotta. If Fox News wants to criticize the Army, let it be that the Army still disarms soldiers on base so they have to dial 911 for civilian police to defend them from crazy people shooting at them. The right of human beings-—much less Americans, much less the Army—to defend themselves against enemies shooting at them should also be a Fox News value, Ms. Trotta.
This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
|