L. Neil Smith’s THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 901, December 4, 2016
are required. If you don’t believe it can and will,
why are you calling yourself a libertarian?
Previous
Contents
Next
Send Letters to
editor@ncc-1776.org
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication
[Letters to the editor are welcome on any and all subjects. Sign your
letter in the text body with your name and e-mail address as you wish
them to appear, otherwise we will use the information in the "From:"
header!]
Just How Stupid Are They?!
While browsing the gold mine of information that is publicintelligence.net, I came across this gem —
Here's the PDF version, for grins and giggles.
The absolutely hilarious part about it is this line in bold-type red ALL-CAPS across the bottom —
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT USE ONLY – NOT TO BE FURTHER DISSEMINATED WITHOUT ATF PERMISSION
Seriously, folks?
The technology depicted on the poster has been around for over one hundred years before the poster was published (April, 2006).
This sort of information has been in the public domain since the 1950s – that's over fifty years.
Yet this agency still thinks that this is on the level of "TOP SECRET" ?
No wonder we refer to them as "the F- Troop" – the moniker is definitely hard-earned in their case.
Mike Blessing
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author
Re: “The First Amendment Means What It Says” by L. Neil Smith
“Private displays and private sentiments are one thing, well within the rights of every American. But the official public expression of religion, at official public expense, using official public facilities, is wrong.”
Unfortunately, lack of such public displays is also wrong; it is approved by atheists. So it still is choosing sides.
Maybe what really is wrong, is that there are such things as “official public facilities” in the first place, such that no matter what is done with them, it is favoring one religion over another. Or if one cannot imagine life without such facilities, then maybe the wrong thing is having any policy at all about it—better to just let private individuals put their own displays up on them, without government vetting or permission.
Of course that would be anarchy, and as we all know, anarchy
cannot work.
http://strike-the-root.com/let-us-prove-that-anarchy-cant-work
Paul Bonneau
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author
This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)
TLE AFFILIATE
