L. Neil Smith’s THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 927, June 18, 2017
Send Letters to editor@ncc-1776.org
Note: All letters to this address will be considered for
publication unless they say explicitly Not For Publication
[Letters to the editor are welcome on any and all subjects. Sign your
letter in the text body with your name and e-mail address as you wish
them to appear, otherwise we will use the information in the "From:"
header!]
They Want a Shooting War?
I see where a Democrat activist shot an unarmed Republican congressman and staffer in a park in Alexandria this morning so Democrats could spend the rest of the week pushing for more “gun control” … even though a massacre was prevented only due to the fact Capitol police were present with, you know … guns.
My prediction on the Legacy Media “spin” by this evening? “Republicans, who brought this on themselves with their racism, now try to blame it on a black Democrat!”
California Sen. Kamala Harris is reportedly quite upset that the shooter died of his wounds. She was hoping to ask him six or eight times whether he’d ”ever met with the Russian ambassador.”
Next month: What about the BELGIANS? Has anyone associated with Donald Trump ever met with the BELGIAN ambassador? Impeachment looms!
Vin Suprynowicz
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
2017 Congressional baseball shooting—Wikipedia
Amazing—the story is young and there is already an entry for it! But the comments “Passionate Progressive” and Bernie Sanders connection says it all. Progressivism and socialism and the other forms of statism go against everything that libertarianism and the founding values of America stand for. We are supposed to be a nation where power is transferred peacefully—not by political violence verging on open warfare. Maybe it’s because we’ve allowed the government to get too big and too powerful and the stakes are getting too high. That’s the only explanation I can figure why people will go as far as trying to kill someone because of the outcome of an election.
Jeff Fullerton
[email protected]
[Well, you know, them Wikipedia editors have a lot of time on their hands. Not much happens in their parent’s basements.—Editor]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Knife Rights
Governor Abbott has signed Texas House Bill 1935, captioned “Relating to the carrying of certain knives, creating a criminal offense”.
The parts that matter to us, persons over the age of 18 are no longer forbidden from carrying daggers, Bowie knives, throwing knives, swords, spears, and knives over 5.5 inches outside of gun free zones (defined in the statute). They may carry any style of knife 5.5 inches long in almost any place period, whether that blade be single or double edged. Persons under the age of eighteen face the same unjust or reasonable restrictions (depending on your perspective) they usually face on going armed. I recommend having a lawyer versed in the intricacies, particulars, peculiarities, subtleties, and yes, absurdities of Texas law and jurisprudence.
I would suggest carrying your sword, machete,or other blade 16-inches or longer on a seperate weapon belt or baldric. I also opine that it would be a good idea to carry your Bowie knife, Arkansas Toothpick, cingueda, facon, or kris in a quick detach sheath instead of a belt loop sheath if you insist on wearing it on the belt that holds up or decorates your pants, given the large number of gun free zones in the Lone Star State.
I see business opportunity making baldrics, sword belt, and or aftermarket sheaths. Also, I would like to see a 5.5"-inch version of the Bauchop Warlock or Witch introduced into the Texas market. Entrepeneurial opportunities abound.
A.X. Perez
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)
TLE AFFILIATE