Down With Power Audiobook!


L. Neil Smith's
THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE

Number 879, July 3, 2016

"What I want to accomplish artistically
amounts to nothing more than fulfilling
the promise of the American Revolution."
—L. Neil Smith


Previous Previous Table of Contents Contents Next Next

Jefferson's Promise, Smith's Fulfillment
July 4th Reflections on the 30th* Anniversary
of the Covenant of Unanimous Consent

by Dennis Wilson
DennisLeeWilson@yahoo.com

Bookmark and Share

Special to L. Neil Smith's The Libertarian Enterprise

* There are two "origin" dates associated with the Covenant of Unanimous Consent. It was originally published in 1985 in Chapter XVII of The Gallatin Divergence by L. Neil Smith, Del Rey Books (a division of Random House), and was amended by unanimous consent, October, 1986. This is a slightly modified version of my original tribute that was published last year in THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE, Number 828, July 5, 2015 The Covenant of Unanimous Consent does not receive nearly the amount of publicity that it deserves. The USA Imperial Empire is in the late stages of fascism (crony-corporatism). The Covenant can play an important role among those who plan now to survive and rebuild after the breakup of the United States and the collapse of the military empire.

"What I want to accomplish artistically amounts to nothing more than fulfilling the promise of the American Revolution."
—L. Neil Smith

Tomorrow being the Fourth of July, 2016, it is timely to again review what L. Neil Smith wrote in 1985 and amended by unanimous consent 30 years ago, in 1986, and what I have described elsewhere as "the fulfillment of the promise of Jefferson's Declaration"[1].

L. Neil Smith's Covenant of Unanimous Consent actually FULFILLS the promise of individual freedom in Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. The Covenant is simple, rational, personal, easy to understand and even short enough to memorize. It easily fits on one side of a single piece of paper--and is currently available in English, Spanish, French and German![5]

The Covenant also satisfies the objections noted by Lysander Spooner[2] in 1870. Instead of being a document that describes how the government shall act, and a document YOU did NOT sign, the Covenant is a document that describes how YOU will act and is a document that YOU VOLUNTARILY SIGN, IF YOU AGREE.

Those who do not sign (the “dissenters” mentioned by Ayn Rand[3] in 1964) are not punished. They are simply and clearly warned what to expect if they violate the EXPLICITLY CLAIMED rights of Signatories.

The Covenant of Unanimous Consent is indeed the political foundation, the “legal framework needed to establish and maintain a free society open to all, including dissenters” as was suggested by Ayn Rand. I explore that legal framework concept further in my own article, What *IS* The Bare Minimum...? at http://tinyurl.com/The-Bare-Minimum

To live together peacefully and productively:

Follow the Precepts of the Covenant and no "government" will be necessary;

Violate the Precepts of the Covenant and no amount of government will be sufficient.

I think that Mr. Smith's Covenant of Unanimous Consent has indeed fulfilled "the promise of the American Revolution." Well done, sir![4]

Live long and prosper,

Dennis Lee Wilson
Signatory: The Covenant of Unanimous Consent


Notes

[1] [2006-08-20] “…to Institute new Government, laying its foundation…” How the Covenant of Unanimous Consent fulfills the promise of Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence

[2] Lysander Spooner’s 1870 comment that “The Constitution has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it” comes from his essays No Treason and The Constitution of No Authority which may be found at [this link]

[3] It is well known that Galt’s Gulch as described in Atlas Shrugged has become THE prime model for those seeking relief from our current culture of ever encroaching tyranny. In The Letters of Ayn Rand, The Later Years (1960-1981) page 626, May 2, 1964, commenting about Galt’s Gulch, Ayn Rand said:

"I must mention that Galt's Gulch is not an organized society, but a private club whose members share the same philosophy. It exemplifies the basic moral principles of social relationships among rational men, the principles on which a proper political system should be built.

"It does not deal with questions of political organization, with the details of a legal framework needed to establish and maintain a free society open to all, including dissenters. It does not deal with specifically political principles, only with their moral base."

[4] For convenience, I have collected Mr. Smith's original articles (one of which has almost vanished from the internet) along with my own and other related articles and have indexed them here

[5] Covenant Translations:

Deutsch: Der Konvent der Einstimmige Zustimmung
English: The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Español: El Pacto del Consentimiento Unánime
Français: Le Pacte du Consentement Unanime

This article was originally published on Mr. Wilson's website at [this location]

Creative Commons

Attribution, Share Alike

Permission to redistribute this article, or any portion of it, is herewith granted by the author—provided that appropriate credit is given as per Creative Commons, Attribute, Share Alike.

P.S. Instead of "Pay the Author", please acknowledge the tribute by contributing to (paying) the TLE publication/Editor.


Was that worth reading?
Then why not:


payment type

Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay L. Neil Smith


This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)
TLE AFFILIATE

Big Head Press