The pursuit of happiness and excellence must go on.
Voting is Immoral
by stormy MON
Special to L. Neil Smith’s The Libertarian Enterprise
Provocative title—let's start with what we can agree on: theft and aggression are immoral.
Tom Jefferson 1816: “It is strangely absurd to suppose that a million people, collected together, are not under the same moral laws that bind them separately.”
Voting supports people who will use coercion and theft (taxes) against us “for the public good”—for activities, wasteful and often corrupt, you may not use, or agree with. Why do we do it? Because it was taught in school, WHICH IS THE PURPOSE OF COMPULSORY GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. Voluntary alternatives (especially education) are suppressed. A “free” education that enslaves the mind, is a very high price to pay.
EVERY overpriced, monopolistic government “service” can be competitively privatized. Education, social services, arbitration and space travel, for example. BLM grazing lands should be sold to pay government debt. We've had free market health care for hundreds of years… for livestock and pets. Video streaming and Kindle are private libraries. Railroads are private roads, cars electronically billed.
Governments don't collect taxes to provide services, they attempt “services” to gouge taxes: a protection racket. Instead, YOU can decide how to allocate your resources = consumer financial voting. In a democracy, if 51% want vanilla, all get vanilla. With freedom, you can have chocolate, strawberry or dozens of choices.
CRIME Greatly reducing government theft and assault is a good start. Abolishing the failed Drug War would help empty prisons. Then we can go from there with private security and insurance—think Pinkertons in 1880.
WAR Tom Paine nailed it in 1792 “What inducement has the worker to lay aside his peaceful pursuit and go to war with the laborer of another country? War is the gambling table of governments, and citizens the dupes of the game.” What if they gave a war, and nobody came?
And of course government has no credibility interfering in social activities or what we ingest.
July 4, 1776: “Whenever any government becomes destructive, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it…”
Here's the fatal flaw: government is aggression— theft and coercion—it can NEVER work. How do we get from tyranny to freedom… again? La Boetie explained… in 1577:
“Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once
free. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple
him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will
behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled
away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.”
Kahlil Gibran The Prophet, Freedom 1923: “If it is a despot you would dethrone, see first his throne erected within you is destroyed.”
It won't be easy, and as always, some parts will not be pretty. The U.S. Government is morally and financially bankrupt. It will be ugly when the Ponzi pyramid scheme finally collapses; Individual Freedom is THE alternative, just like 1776. Next, the last step in our long journey that started with The Magna Carta (1215), is NO GOVERNMENT = no coercion, as Thoreau imagined in 1846: “That government is best which governs least… or not at all.”
By voting, you are an accomplice, an enabler—advocating theft and coercion are good for your community. Do you really believe that? NOT voting eliminates “the consent of the governed”.
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)<
L. Neil Smith‘s The Libertarian Enterprise does not collect, use, or process any personal data. Our affiliate partners, have their own policies which you can find out from their websites.