by Our Readers
Send Letters to [email protected]
Letter from Laissez Firearm
Letter from Barbara Cunningham
Letter from Eric Madsen
Letter from Dwayne Childers
Letter from James S. Rustad
Letter from Scott Sullivan
Letter from Nicholas Weininger
Letter from Laissez Firearm
[re: "The Good Joe"]
> I've seen a lot of folks trying to figure out how to get
> some of the gov. free money and stuff. But, I have
> seen no complaints or even commie
> style allegations of 'price gouging'.
> . . .
> I expect better than this from you guys.
Bub, I live about 2.5 miles away from the state legislature in
Raleigh (and less than a mile from the Hayes Barton Baptist Church,
where Jesse Helms goes to pray), and "price-gouging" was on the lips
of every editorialist weasel and elected dirtbag in town for at least
two weeks after Floyd. How many column-inches of newsprint or feet of
videotape would you like to see?
--
Laissez Firearm
Back to the top
Letter from Barbara Cunningham
Vin Suprynowicz advocates passage of the "Asset Forfeiture Reform
Bill". I understand his reasoning, but I believe it is flawed.
While asset forfeiture may, in part, be related to the English custom
of seizing abandoned smuggler's craft, it is most directly related to
the grand old English monarch's practice of declaring Bills of
Attainder against individuals. In a Bill of Attainder, an individual
is declared an outlaw whose property is forfeit to the government.
Under asset forfeiture, an individual is declared an outlaw (i.e.,
someone who has broken a law) whose property is forfeit to the
government. Article 1, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
expressly forbids the federal government from passing bills of
attainder. Article 1, Section 10 applies the same prohibition to the
various and several states.
Reforming an unconstitutional and illegal government action merely
gives it legitimacy. Once legitimate, the abuse will, inevitably,
grow even more exponentially than it does now. Is this what we really
want?
Barbara Cunningham <[email protected]>
Back to the top
Letter from Eric Madsen
I'm writing to tell you about a website devoted to gun control and
2nd amendment issues. It makes for excellent reading.
http://www.guncite.com/index.html
I sent a message to paxusa with information from the guncite website
that refutes paxusa's "facts" section. I am in no way affiliated with
guncite. I don't even know who runs the website.
Regards,
Eric Madsen <[email protected]>
Back to the top
Letter from Dwayne Childers
>It seems very odd to me that the ferals would ever let
>themselves get boxed in on something like Waco.
Of course not. And the drama is just too satisfying, too simple to be
real. Wow, Judge Walter S. Smith Jr. 'threatens' to hold the justice
department in contempt of court. After they turned the documents
over, the judge 'decided' not to do so, after all.
Waco politics is a poor facsimile of pro wrestling. We may not know
the precise motives, but it's easy to see that it's all fake.
Dwayne Childers <[email protected]>
Back to the top
Letter from James S. Rustad
Thought you'd be interested in my response to the Levi's on-line
gun-control petition. I left the following remarks in their talk-back
area:
-------------------
Given your support of gun control as expressed in your on-line
petition, I have a few comments to make.
1) I will never again purchase any Levi's jeans or any product
manufactured by your company.
2) Those Levi's I do own will never again be worn.
3) Since I hate to see anything go to waste, I will try to use those
Levi's in an appropriate manner (cleaning rags for my firearms
springs to mind as an appropriate use).
-------------------
James S. Rustad <[email protected]>
Back to the top
Letter from Scott Sullivan
Regarding TLE 59 Editor's Notes:
It's not that the government is trying to push a few buttons. I
cannot give politicians as a whole enough credit to orchestrate a
planned release of evidence as is occurring with waco.
It's not a government conspiracy. It is merely the result of an 'us
against them' mentality in government workers that results in cases
of brutality or unnecessary force.
It's cowboy law enforcement where police academy trainees are no
longer screened by the townsfolk ... psychos are welcome to apply as
we have SWAT Sniper positions open.
It's a 'that could have been me' attitude that causes one government
employee to cover up for another's lapse in judgement. And in a
nation of 275m people, how many are in law enforcement? And what are
the odds on any given day that one of them will make a mistake that
gets to the press? And if enough of them cover it up, even the repeat
offenders that comprise walking timebombs with badges are going to
cause damage before they get ejected.
It's a 'them against us' attitude amongst the civilians that don't
understand how a stupid policy can result in the confiscation of
their home because their child was a friend of a drug-dealing teen
who spent the night and did some business.
So what is happening with the Waco evidence and trial is not a case
of the government provoking us, it's something even more sinister and
dangerous. It's a lack of attention to the details that would get
lots of people fired and jailed in recent years. And the lack of
attention can only be attributed to the police-state mentality
already present among LEOs who believe they are above the law.
After all, what are you going to do about it?
Nothing?
Thought so.
Scott Sullivan <[email protected]>
Back to the top
Letter from Nicholas Weininger
To the Editor of TLE:
I recently read a novel I thought would be of considerable interest
to TLE readers. The novel is
Cryptonomicon, by Neal Stephenson.
It's an enormous, epic SF-historical-mathematical-whatever novel.
It's great fun. Highly recommended.
It's also the most explicitly libertarian novel I've seen in a long
time from an SF writer not generally thought to be affiliated with
"the movement." A large part of the plot centers around an attempt to
create a data haven where people can exchange information and
electronic cash safe from the prying eyes of tax collectors; one of
the sympathetic characters is a collector of automatic weapons; and a
cryptographic algorithm is demonstrated in the novel (and explained
in the Appendix) which is specifically designed for secure
communications without a computer, the description containing
numerous references to how to prevent secret police agents from
getting hold of your keys.
But the most interesting libertarian idea in the book is the
"Holocaust Education and Avoidance Pod." This is a set of historical
and practical information that one of the book's main characters, an
Orthodox Jew, plans to put together and distribute over the Internet
as a means of increasing people's ability to resist tyranny. A
significant part of the HEAP is apparently devoted to instructions
for making your own guns in a basement workshop, and there are some
fairly detailed discussions about the design of the "HEAP gun" (which
I unfortunately don't know enough about gunsmithing to comment upon).
This seems to me to be not only a Really Good Idea, but also the sort
of thing that Messrs. Smith, Zelman, et al. would have the knowledge
and desire to turn into reality.
In Liberty,
Nicholas Weininger <[email protected]>>>
Back to the top