Back to the top

Letter from The Illuminati

An Invitation

Are you a business man?

Business woman?

Artist?

Politicians?

Student?

Etc... And you want to become Big and Rich, Protections and Powerful, famous, Promoting your Job office position and make your company product the most popular and best seller in the world, join us to become one of our official Illuminati brotherhood member today and you shall be given a chance to visit the Illuminati initiation center and his representative after registrations are completed by you,

Illuminati brotherhood brings along wealth and famous in life, you have a full access to eradicate poverty away from your life now.

It is only a member who has been initiated into the church of Illuminati that have the authority to bring any member to the church, so the Illuminati initiation for this year new members is available now Join us today and realize your dreams.

Once you become a member you will be Rich true whatever you are doing on this planet as your occupation more ideals will be giving to you and protected and as an actor or actress Politicians you will be famous and powerful for the rest of your life, the Illuminati makes they members happy so Join and be one of the successful Person on earth if you are interested fill the form below to the below email address to enable the Illuminati registration department process your membership and an invitation for the initiation will be send to you wherever you are in any part of the World.

Email Address:
Full Name:…..
Nationality:…..
Current Full Address:….
Country:…….
Occupation:......
Date of Birth:……..
Gender:……….
Phone No:…….
Email Address:….
Tell us a little about yourself…

WARNING: If you are not interested or Below 18 Years old Do not reply.

This Message Is From The Illuminati Worldwide Occult Government Center.

[ Er... Um... The things that show up in the in-box!—Editor ]

Back to the top

Letter from Roger Clark

Re: "No Right to be Armed?" by A.X. Perez (in this issue)

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo. The smaller the extent of the territory, the more difficult will it be for the people to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition, and the more easy will it be to defeat their early efforts. Intelligence can be more speedily obtained of their preparations and movements, and the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance.

The obstacles to usurpation and the facilities of resistance increase with the increased extent of the state, provided the citizens understand their rights and are disposed to defend them. The natural strength of the people in a large community, in proportion to the artificial strength of the government, is greater than in a small, and of course more competent to a struggle with the attempts of the government to establish a tyranny. But in a confederacy the people, without exaggeration, may be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate. Power being almost always the rival of power, the general government will at all times stand ready to check the usurpations of the state governments, and these will have the same disposition towards the general government. The people, by throwing themselves into either scale, will infallibly make it preponderate. If their rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress. How wise will it be in them by cherishing the union to preserve to themselves an advantage which can never be too highly prized!

Alexander Hamilton. Federalist # 28

The 9th circuit has long been a kangaroo court dedicated to furthering the leftist progressive agenda. Some 15 years or so ago I began to predict a civil war during the first half of the 2020s decade. Since it seems likely that Hillary will be elected and will condemn SCOTUS to the same fate as the 9th it seems I was off by a few years.

Roger Clark
[email protected]

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author

Back to the top

Letter from TJ Mason

A Little Rewrite Music, Maestro!

The right of the people (an INDIVIDUAL right) to keep and bear arms, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE (because the individuals of that state gather voluntarily to train as a well-regulated—trained—militia), SHALL NOT (an imperative, not to be reversed or tampered with) be infringed (open, concealed; handgun, rifle, shotgun; single shot, revolver, semi-automatic, or full auto—even Hamilton said that the public should have—should be expected to have—the same arms as the military).

Attempts to limit or prevent the individual right to keep and bear arms, being actions which compromise the security of the free state, are thus acts of war against the United States, which is regulated not by the Bill of Rights but by the main body of the Constitution. Ah, where was that? Article III, Section 3, I do recall...

Only a corrupt, fraudulent lawyer (Mrs. Clinton, anyone, or the INjustices of the 9th Circus Court) or an incompetent who cannot read and understand the English language, could manufacture loopholes in an argument that tight. Though actually I don't believe she's thought about loopholes, just what she wants...

The question I want someone (Mr. Trump, perhaps, since he's the only person likely to get close enough) to ask Mrs. C is: "I'm sitting at home when someone who ignored your disarm order kicks in the door. Do you want me to be able to defend myself and my family? Or do you want me dead, my wife or daughter raped and murdered? Those are the only two choices. When the door is already broken in, it's too late to call the police. Defending myself? Or dead?" If the former, everything she built goes up in smoke. If the latter...why would anyone vote for someone who wants them dead? "It's for the children?" REALLY? Everyone one of them was unprotected BY GOVERNMENT FIAT. Why should ANYONE listen to or obey such an order?

TJ Mason
[email protected]

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author

Back to the top

This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)
TLE AFFILIATE