Back to the top

Letter from Jeff Fullerton

Self-Defense Is A Human Right – Bearing Arms

Self-Defense Is A Human Right
by Cam Edwards
I’d like to think a statement like the headline above wouldn’t be all that controversial, but I know better. In fact, one of the biggest groups that supposedly fights for human rights would (and has) whole-heartedly disagreed with that conclusion, and on today’s Bearing Arms’ Cam & Co. we’re wading in to Amnesty International’s amicus brief submitted to the Supreme Court that argues the right to armed self-defense not only violates international law, but is in fact a human rights violation.
[ Read More ]]

It appears that Amnesty International prefers victims are not empowered to defend themselves because genocide is the lesser of two evils as opposed to full blown civil war when the victims can shoot back. And they are also concerned that robbers and rapists might be denied their right to life by victims in defense of property or personal virtue. And we know that government criminals also known as tyrants want their prospective victims disarmed to make life safe for themselves and the minions they would send door to door to impose their will and expropriate private wealth.

They complain that self defense introduces too much complexity to the equation. Well, the best way to simplify that is the Zero Aggression Principle that forbids the initiation of force against other human beings and justifies it in defense of life, liberty and property.

Very simple and ultimately just.

Jeff Fullerton
[email protected]

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

PAY Jeff Fullerton

Back to the top

Another Letter from A.X. Perez

Free to Be You and Me?

“Kill the Indian, and Save the Man” — Capt. Richard H. Pratt

The above quote refers to a philosophy of forcing Native Americans to not only adopt and assimilate into American culture, but to give up their tribal identities and cultures in the process. Up until the 1960’s Chicano students were suspended from school for speaking Spanish on public school campuses in El Paso in private conversations until the US Supreme Court ruled this was protected by the right to freedom of speech. Of course, the goal of encouraging them to adapt and assimilate into American culture was admirable, demanding they give up the culture they practiced at home, not so much. Immigrants often had their names Anglicized, went through the whole Speak English, again not only to force them to Americanize, but to give up their old culture.

There is nothing wrong with demanding that people under American rule become loyal Americans, learn the American Way, learn to love liberty and constitutional government. We do need a common public culture and language, but we do need room for variations from other cultures. There’s a big difference in asking people to become true Americans and demanding they become Imitation Anglo-Americans trapped in a one size fits all Procrustean bed definition of what’s a real American.

You may think, "“here goes Albert, on a multicultural, embrace the diversity rant.” Not guilty, or at least there are extenuating circumstances. After carefully looking at what “cancel culture” and political correctness demand it becomes obvious that what they are calling for is that we cut our hair, change our names, and speak their dialect of English and only that dialect. They don’t want Southerners to put aside racism, they want us to put aside being Southerners. They want Mid- and South-westerners and just plain Westerners to become imitation Yankees, and their kind of Yankees.

In The Lathe of Heaven Ursula K. Le Guin tells the story of a young man with the power to rewrite reality. Trying to make things better, it seems every world is just that little bit worse in each iteration, reaching the point where he writes the love of his life out of the story.

The liberal/progressive left is trying to make us all gray, to kill our cultures in order to save us by making us just like them. They make claim they want us to have diversity, but in the end what they mean is we have permission to be who they tell us to be.

A.X. Perez
[email protected]

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

PAY A.X. Perez

Back to the top

Letter from Dennis Wilson

Video Reveals Pandemic Was Planned to Experiment Universal Vaccine by Mandate in the General Public

In 2017, at the very beginning of the Trump administration, Fauci predicted some kind of pandemic was coming and would affect the new administration. In 2019, Fauci and a group of scientists were planning a pandemic to experiment a universal vaccine on the general population and submit the people under control of a totalitarian global system. Oann has the videos.

Dennis Wilson
[email protected]

Was that worth reading?
Then why not:

PAY Dennis Wilson

Back to the top

This site may receive compensation if a product is purchased
through one of our partner or affiliate referral links. You
already know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC Disclosure
Policy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)
TLE AFFILIATE