 |
|
|
THE LIBERTARIAN ENTERPRISE
Number 697, November 18, 2012
Tribal chieftains, kings, ministers, politicians, bureaucrats, and
union leaders are mere parasites, scavengers, bottom-feeders who take
advantage of the common individual's simple, commendable desire to
improve his or her place in life and build a better future for his or
her children. Those virtues the criminal scum label "selfishness" and
condemn.
[Letters to the editor are welcome on any and all subjects. Sign your
letter in the text body with your name and e-mail address as you wish
them to appear, otherwise we will use the information in the "From:"
header!]
Re: "Making 'Voluntary' Service Mandatory—One Step At A Time",
by C. Jeffery Small
I continue to be amazed that people who call Heinlein's Starship
Troopers fascistic for suggesting that honestly voluntary service
a condition of voting or holding office nonetheless support mandatory
service to the government. Perhaps they will have the honesty to call
it the Robot (mandatory slave labor required of Slavic peasants), or
at least the testicularity.
I very much believe in honestly voluntary service, I strongly
disapprove of mandatory service. Reminds me too much of the line from
Stirling's Domination of the Draka series: Service to the
State, Glory to the Race. I understand the mentality that goes
into this philosophy. Since I have sworn to reject Satan, his
splendor and his pomps, I must give it a pass.
A.X. Perez
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Hopefully I inspired
CNN
Parker might have Libertarian candidate Powell Gammill to blame if he does not win. Gammill won more than 6% of the vote in Tuesday's election despite urging supporters to stay home rather than vote on Election Day in protest of the political system.
And I wasn't alone in Arizona.
The PR that started it:
-For Immediate Release-
Nov. 6, 2012
Powell Picks Parker's Pocket
Today it was my privilege to deny Vernon Parker—Neocon tool
endorsed by Daddy Bush and who's favorite Arizona politician is
Sieg Kyl—a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. So
disenchanted were voters with Parker that he was beaten by an avowed
bisexual Marxist in a conservative state in a congressional district
in which independence reigns. Mr. Gammill wants to thank everyone
who just couldn't stomach voting for either parasite for their votes.
Congressman Kyrsten Sinema, who failed to receive a majority of the
vote will face a Libertarian again in two years. Mr. Gammill will
keep his platform of selling off the federal government to pay off
the debt, bringing home the troops from around the planet and getting
them back to their families and their lives, and to restore our stolen
civil liberties and our freedom to do as we please—free from
government coercion.
Neither candidate bothered to answer voters concerns over their
positions or proposed policies during the campaigns instead spending
98% of their time fundraising. And a compliant news media let them.
Kyrsten Sinema spent $1,666,270 as of the last reporting period, while
Vernon Parker spent $808,381. (source: Open Secrets) Libertarian
Powell Gammill spent some $37 on gasoline and copier paper, or about
a third of a penny per vote.
Fifty-three percent of the voters in District 9 followed my advice and
stayed home this election. I predict it will be 60% the next time.
Powell Gammill
Libertarian Candidate
U.S. Congressional District 9 (AZ)
Congress - Dist. 9
141 of 141 Precincts Reporting (updated)
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent
|
| PARKER, VERNON B. (REP) |
94,697 |
45.35% |
| SINEMA, KYRSTEN (DEM) |
100,486 |
48.13% |
| GAMMILL, POWELL (LBT) |
13,307 |
6.37% |
| Write-in |
301 |
0.14% |
| Total |
208,791 |
|
AND a 4 min.
"campaign ad" for me just for fun.
Powell Gammill
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
A Brilliant Idea!
Note: this lady is a Texas osteopath who Friended me today.
Here is a proposal for another petition on the White House site. Give
me your suggestions for improvements. I suspect this site will either
be shut down or changed in the near future. Let's get this in first.
They won't do this, but it will receive more consideration here by a
larger group of people than anywhere else we can get it published.
Call for Executive Orders to Nullify Unconstitutional Federal
Legislation and Restore a System of Checks and Balances
We the people of the United States of America call for the immediate
nullification by means of Executive Order of the Patriot Act, NDAA,
H.R. 347: Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act
of 2011, and all previous Executive Orders that exceeded the range
and scope of the powers of the Executive Office in accordance with
the original intentions of the founders of this great nation as
evidenced by the US Constitution. We further call for restoration of
the original checks and balances established at this nation's birth.
As such, the Supreme Court will not be authorized to refuse to hear
cases of possible Constitutional violations.
Amanda Kim Case
Forwarded by L. Neil Smith
[email protected]
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
Bimbo Alert!
So apparently Hostess, the noted producer of Twinkies, is shutting
down due to an inability to resolve a union dispute. I preferred their
creme filled Chocolate cupcakes myself, but de gustabis non
comrehendis and all that. Whichever of their products you crave,
the owner of Hostess has announced he is shutting down and not going
back to the table. You're sadly out of luck, buddy.
Until some other company buys up the rights to make that product and
the sugary starchy goodness of Twinkies and other Hostess products
return to the shelf, sorta like if someone buys up Dornaus and Dixon's
gun designs and brings their guns back, again (several companies have
and are trying. Sooner or later...). One of the companies on the list
to bring back Twinkies and Ding Dongs (among other's) is Bimbo Bread
out of Mexico.
Back in the early 1990's Bimbo (or at least the company that owns it)
used to make tortillas in Juarez, Mexico. The cost of making tortillas
went up in Juarez due to the El Paso Electric Company raising its
rates and making tortillas more expensive to produce than allowed by
law. The Mexican government would not let the tortilla producers raise
their prices to cover the difference and Bimbo and others switched
over to making sweet bread type snacks to export to El Paso. This may
not have been the only thing going on when Bimbo moved in to the US,
but it was at least a significant part of the process.
So now an American Company is being put out of business by unions tied
in to our ruling party and its product lines may survive as part of a
Mexican owned multinational that was forced into entering the American
market (admittedly in line with a preexisting business plan.) by
Mexico's ruling Party (PRI) at he time, one that our current ruling
party would find quite sympatico.
Apparently outwitting The Party is going to become a necessary skill
for American free market entrepreneurs from now on.
A.X. Perez
[email protected]
PS. It is ironic that Mexican drug dealers will now be selling
American druggies the grass that cause them to eat Mexican snacks.
Was that worth reading?
Then why not:
|
Previous
Contents
Next
